Pappas v. Keely
This text of 151 A.2d 467 (Pappas v. Keely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion
These appeals by the defendant, in her individual and representative capacities, are from an order removing a compulsory nonsuit and granting the plaintiff a new trial. Such an order is plainly interlocutory and unappealable. The appeals will, therefore, be quashed. Szmigel v. Director General of Railroads, 266 Pa. 573, 110 A. 639; see also Dellacasse v. Floyd, 332 Pa. 218, 221, 2 A. 2d 860; and DiGregorio v. Skinner, 351 Pa. 441, 446, 41 A. 2d 649.
Appeals quashed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 A.2d 467, 396 Pa. 63, 1959 Pa. LEXIS 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pappas-v-keely-pa-1959.