Pappas v. Hooda Realty, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pappas v. Hooda Realty, Inc.

277 A.D.2d 437, 715 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12318

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 437 (Pappas v. Hooda Realty, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pappas v. Hooda Realty, Inc., 277 A.D.2d 437, 715 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action for specific performance of a real estate contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated [438]*438June 30, 1999, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion to compel specific performance of the terms of a stipulation of settlement.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court did not err in granting the motion of the plaintiffs to compel specific performance of the terms of a stipulation of settlement.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for specific performance of a real estate contract, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated [438]*438June 30, 1999, which, inter alia, granted the plaintiffs’ motion to compel specific performance of the terms of a stipulation of settlement.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court did not err in granting the motion of the plaintiffs to compel specific performance of the terms of a stipulation of settlement.

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 437, 715 N.Y.S.2d 906, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pappas-v-hooda-realty-inc-nyappdiv-2000.