Pappas v. Greater New York Savings Bank
This text of 297 A.D.2d 584 (Pappas v. Greater New York Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Appellants, who operated and controlled the building abutting the public sidewalk, had a nondelegable duty to maintain said building in a manner not to cause injury to those lawfully on the sidewalk such as plaintiff and could be held liable for a dangerous condition, even if caused by an independent contractor (see Rothstein v State of New York, 284 AD2d 130, 131). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Buckley, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
297 A.D.2d 584, 747 N.Y.2d 176, 747 N.Y.S.2d 176, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pappas-v-greater-new-york-savings-bank-nyappdiv-2002.