Pappas v. Greater New York Savings Bank
297 A.D.2d 584, 747 N.Y.2d 176, 747 N.Y.S.2d 176, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8776
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 24, 2002·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellants’ motion for summary judgment was properly denied. Appellants, who operated and controlled the building abutting the public sidewalk, had a nondelegable duty to maintain said building in a manner not to cause injury to those lawfully on the sidewalk such as plaintiff and could be held liable for a dangerous condition, even if caused by an independent contractor (see Rothstein v State of New York, 284 AD2d 130, 131). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Saxe, Buckley, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pappas v. Greater New York Savings Bank, 297 A.D.2d 584, 747 N.Y.2d 176, 747 N.Y.S.2d 176, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8776 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 584 (Pappas v. Greater New York Savings Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johnson v. Carnegie Hall Corp.
2024 NY Slip Op 31138(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Kopinska v. Metal Bright Maintenance Co.
309 A.D.2d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)