Pappas v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
This text of 33 F. App'x 35 (Pappas v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Appellants Michael J. Pappas, Ph.D. and Frederick F. Buechel, M.D., appeal various orders of the District Court for the District of New Jersey concerning their lawsuit against Appellees DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and DePuy International, LTD. These orders denied in part their motion for summary judgment, denied [36]*36their motion to strike certain testimony, and denied their post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law, or, in the alternative, a new trial.
Because we write only for the district court and the parties to this litigation, who are familiar with the circumstances underlying the instant appeal, we need not recite the factual or procedural background of this dispute. We have reviewed the thoughtful Letter Opinion of the district court and the other issues presented on the record, and we will affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in those opinions and on the record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 F. App'x 35, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pappas-v-depuy-orthopaedics-inc-ca3-2002.