Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Pappas v. Cerrone

Pappas v. Cerrone

265 A.D.2d 539, 696 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10802
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 25, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D.2d 539 (Pappas v. Cerrone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pappas v. Cerrone, 265 A.D.2d 539, 696 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lockman, J.), dated October 28, 1998, as granted the defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint, and denied their application to amend the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly dismissed the plaintiffs’ complaint (see, Rudnick v Glendale Sys., 222 AD2d 572; London v Courduff, 141 AD2d 803; see also, Danann Realty Corp. v Harris, 5 NY2d 317). The plaintiffs’ contention that the court erred in denying their application to amend the complaint is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Joy, McGinity and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris
157 N.E.2d 597 (New York Court of Appeals, 1959)
London v. Courduff
141 A.D.2d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Rudnick v. Glendale Systems, Inc.
222 A.D.2d 572 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D.2d 539, 696 N.Y.S.2d 890, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pappas-v-cerrone-nyappdiv-1999.