Papin v. Ruelle

2 Mo. 26
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMay 15, 1828
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Mo. 26 (Papin v. Ruelle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Papin v. Ruelle, 2 Mo. 26 (Mo. 1828).

Opinion

Wash, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The plaintiff, Papin, sued Ruelle in an action of trespass before a Justice of the Peace, for cutting down, taking and carrying away certain trees from off the plaintiff’s land, &c. The plaintiff had judgment for one dollar, and the Justice gave judgment for three, under the statute allowing treble damages. Ruelle appealed to the Circuit Court, where the judgment of the Justice was reversed, and the appeal dismissed, on the ground that Papin had misconceived his action. Of this there can he no doubt. The statement, or declaration and summons, both show it; treble damages are recoverable only in an action of debt. The plaintiff’s' statement, however, is in form and substance a good declaration, in trespass generally, under the statute, Rev. Code, p. 413, sec. 1 ;■ and upon it the plaintiff might have recovered for the actual damage sustained. The case of Papin v. Montague, decided at the last term of this Court, is not distinguished in. principle from the present. The Circuit Court erred in dismissing the appeal; its judgment is, therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial conformably to this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Hagan
245 S.W. 336 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Mo. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/papin-v-ruelle-mo-1828.