Papazian v. Kulhanjian

107 So. 2d 129
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 3, 1958
StatusPublished

This text of 107 So. 2d 129 (Papazian v. Kulhanjian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Papazian v. Kulhanjian, 107 So. 2d 129 (Fla. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final decree entered upon an accounting by the appellant Papazian pursuant to the mandate of this court in Armenian Hotel Owners, Inc., v. Kulhanjian, Fla. 1957, 96 So.2d 146; Id., Fla., 96 So.2d 896.

We have carefully examined the Master’s Report upon which the final decree was based and find no error except as to the item of $2,000 expended by Papazian for the lease assignment. Under the circumstances shown by this record, it is our view that, in equity and good conscience, Papazian should have received credit for this expenditure.

Accordingly, the decree should be modified to reflect a credit to Papazian of $2,000 and, as so modified, is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ARMENIAN HOTEL OWNERS v. Kulhanjian
96 So. 2d 146 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 So. 2d 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/papazian-v-kulhanjian-fla-1958.