Paparodis v. Snively

Ohio Supreme Court

Paparodis v. Snively

881 N.E.2d 869, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1414

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 27, 2008·No. 2008-0218·Published

Opinion

Columbiana App. No. 06 CO 5, 2007-0hio-6910. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On January 28, 2008, when this appeal was filed, a check in the amount of $40.00 was submitted by counsel for appellant to satisfy the requirement of the [1415] docket fee imposed by R.C. 2503.17 and S.CtPrae.R. XV(1). This court has been informed by the Office of the Treasurer of the State of Ohio that the check was returned because of insufficient funds. Whereas R.C. 2503.17 and S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1) require that the docket fee shall be paid before a notice of appeal is filed or a case is docketed,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Columbiana App. No. 06 CO 5, 2007-0hio-6910. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. On January 28, 2008, when this appeal was filed, a check in the amount of $40.00 was submitted by counsel for appellant to satisfy the requirement of the [1415] docket fee imposed by R.C. 2503.17 and S.CtPrae.R. XV(1). This court has been informed by the Office of the Treasurer of the State of Ohio that the check was returned because of insufficient funds. Whereas R.C. 2503.17 and S.Ct.Prac.R. XV(1) require that the docket fee shall be paid before a notice of appeal is filed or a case is docketed,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is dismissed.

Paparodis v. Snively, 881 N.E.2d 869, 117 Ohio St. 3d 1414 (Ohio 2008).

Pincite

881 N.E.2d 869 (Paparodis v. Snively) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.