PAPARDELLE 1068, INC. v. Internal Revenue Service

District of Columbia

PAPARDELLE 1068, INC. v. Internal Revenue Service

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia

DecidedAugust 3, 2020

Docket19-10035

StatusUnknown

This text of PAPARDELLE 1068, INC. v. Internal Revenue Service (PAPARDELLE 1068, INC. v. Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

PAPARDELLE 1068, INC. v. Internal Revenue Service, (D.C. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

The document below is hereby signed. gente, Signed: July 31, 2020 ye” Mm dlls “Oy, CT OF a

tttha □□ BY ae S. Martin Teel, Jr. United States Bankruptcy Judge

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

In re ) ) PAPARDELLE 1068, INC., ) Case No. 19-00554 ) (Chapter 11) Debtor in Possession. ) i) ) PAPARDELLE 1068, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) ) Adversary Proceeding No. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et ) 19-10035 al., ) ) Not for publication in Defendants. ) West’s Bankruptcy Reporter. MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING In advance of deciding whether to dismiss the debtor’s bankruptcy case or, instead, to convert the case to Chapter 7, I ordered the parties to show cause why the adversary proceeding ought not be dismissed (without adjudicating any of the claims asserted). The United States has responded that the case ought to be dismissed, citing, among other decisions, In re Moseley,

161 B.R. 382 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 1993). The other parties have not responded. For reasons previously set forth in ordering the parties to show cause why the case ought not be dismissed, and based also on the reasoning of In re Moseley as discussed by the response of the United States, I will dismiss the adversary proceeding without adjudicating any of the claims asserted. An order follows. [Signed and dated above.] Copies to: All counsel of record.

2 R:\Common\TeelSM\Judge Temp Docs\Papperdelle 1068 - Mem Decision re Dismissal.wpd

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The document below is hereby signed. gente, Signed: July 31, 2020 ye” Mm dlls “Oy, CT OF a

tttha □□ BY ae S. Martin Teel, Jr. United States Bankruptcy Judge

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

In re ) ) PAPARDELLE 1068, INC., ) Case No. 19-00554 ) (Chapter 11) Debtor in Possession. ) i) ) PAPARDELLE 1068, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vv. ) ) Adversary Proceeding No. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et ) 19-10035 al., ) ) Not for publication in Defendants. ) West’s Bankruptcy Reporter. MEMORANDUM DECISION REGARDING DISMISSING ADVERSARY PROCEEDING In advance of deciding whether to dismiss the debtor’s bankruptcy case or, instead, to convert the case to Chapter 7, I ordered the parties to show cause why the adversary proceeding ought not be dismissed (without adjudicating any of the claims asserted). The United States has responded that the case ought to be dismissed, citing, among other decisions, In re Moseley,

161 B.R. 382 (Bankr. E.D. Tex. 1993). The other parties have not responded. For reasons previously set forth in ordering the parties to show cause why the case ought not be dismissed, and based also on the reasoning of In re Moseley as discussed by the response of the United States, I will dismiss the adversary proceeding without adjudicating any of the claims asserted. An order follows. [Signed and dated above.] Copies to: All counsel of record.

2 R:\Common\TeelSM\Judge Temp Docs\Papperdelle 1068 - Mem Decision re Dismissal.wpd

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

PAPARDELLE 1068, INC. v. Internal Revenue Service, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/papardelle-1068-inc-v-internal-revenue-service-dcb-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack