Papadopoulos v. Papadopoulos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Papadopoulos v. Papadopoulos

301 A.D.2d 391, 752 N.Y.S.2d 860, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 110

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 9, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 301 A.D.2d 391 (Papadopoulos v. Papadopoulos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Papadopoulos v. Papadopoulos, 301 A.D.2d 391, 752 N.Y.S.2d 860, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.; Judith Gische, J.), entered September 27, 2001, March 15, 2002 and May 17, 2002, which, inter alia, directed defendant to pay plaintiff temporary maintenance and child support and post security therefor, pay plaintiff interim counsel fees, pay for a forensic accounting of the parties’ business, and surrender his passport to the court, and awarded plaintiff exclusive use and occupancy of one of the parties’ vacation homes, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant fails to show that he is financially unable to pay the subject temporary awards of maintenance and child support or other exigent circumstances warranting appellate modification thereof, or that he is not presently far better situated than plaintiff to bear the bulk of litigation costs (see Anonymous v Anonymous, 241 AD2d 353; Charpie v Charpie, 271 AD2d 169, 171-172). All issues regarding the vacation properties would be best resolved at a speedy trial. We have considered and rejected defendant’s other contentions. Concur — Buckley, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.; Judith Gische, J.), entered September 27, 2001, March 15, 2002 and May 17, 2002, which, inter alia, directed defendant to pay plaintiff temporary maintenance and child support and post security therefor, pay plaintiff interim counsel fees, pay for a forensic accounting of the parties’ business, and surrender his passport to the court, and awarded plaintiff exclusive use and occupancy of one of the parties’ vacation homes, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant fails to show that he is financially unable to pay the subject temporary awards of maintenance and child support or other exigent circumstances warranting appellate modification thereof, or that he is not presently far better situated than plaintiff to bear the bulk of litigation costs (see Anonymous v Anonymous, 241 AD2d 353; Charpie v Charpie, 271 AD2d 169, 171-172). All issues regarding the vacation properties would be best resolved at a speedy trial. We have considered and rejected defendant’s other contentions. Concur — Buckley, J.P., Ellerin, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

301 A.D.2d 391, 752 N.Y.S.2d 860, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/papadopoulos-v-papadopoulos-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack