Paolucci v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
127 A.3d 1289
This text of 127 A.3d 1289 (Paolucci v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Paolucci v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 127 A.3d 1289 (Pa. 2015).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues are:
(1) Does the Commonwealth Court’s opinion conflict with this Court’s precedent in Bortz v. WCAB, [546 Pa. 77, 683 A.2d 259 (1996),] which recognized the distinct conduct stan[1290]*1290dards in workers’ compensation and unemployment compensation adjudi-catiops?
(2) Does the Commonwealth Court’s opinion conflict with this Court’s precedent in Harkness v. U[nemployment Comp. Bd. of Review 591 Pa. 543, 920 A.2d 162 (2007),] which emphasized the prompt and- informal nature of unemployment compensation proceedings and, therefore, presents a question of such substantial public importance as to require this Court’s definitive resolution?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harkness v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
920 A.2d 162 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)
Bortz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
683 A.2d 259 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
127 A.3d 1289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paolucci-v-unemployment-compensation-board-of-review-pa-2015.