Paolo Martin Labo Ruesta v. Thomas R. Diaz
This text of Paolo Martin Labo Ruesta v. Thomas R. Diaz (Paolo Martin Labo Ruesta v. Thomas R. Diaz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
PAOLO MARTIN LABO RUESTA, Appellant,
v.
THOMAS R. DIAZ, KERRI DIAZ, and SURAPANAENE RAMU, Appellees.
No. 4D2024-1831
[October 22, 2025]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael A. Robinson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE22- 008800.
Paolo Martin Labo Ruesta, Coral Springs, pro se.
Kevin D. Franz and Drew W. Peeler of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory. Without knowing the factual context, neither can an appellate court reasonably conclude that the trial judge so misconceived the law as to require reversal.”).
GROSS, GERBER, JJ., and SHULLMAN, SARAH L., Associate Judge, concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paolo Martin Labo Ruesta v. Thomas R. Diaz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paolo-martin-labo-ruesta-v-thomas-r-diaz-fladistctapp-2025.