Paola French v. City of Los Angeles
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NOV 27 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS PAOLA FRENCH; RUSSELL FRENCH, No. 22-55571
Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 5:20-cv-00416-JGB-SP v. Central District of California, Riverside CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ORDER Defendant-Appellant,
and
SALVADOR SANCHEZ, in his official capacity and in his individual capacity; DOES, 1-10, inclusive,
Defendants.
Before: WARDLAW, CHRISTEN, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.
The Memorandum filed on October 16, 2023, Dkt. Entry 49, is amended as
follows:
1. On slip opinion page 5, starting at line 5, replace with .
2. On slip opinion page 5, starting at line 12, delete .
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel
rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no
judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P.
35.
The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are
DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing will be accepted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paola French v. City of Los Angeles (Paola French v. City of Los Angeles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.