Panzer Law, Pa v. US Sugar Corporation

45 So. 3d 544, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15132, 2010 WL 3929068
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 8, 2010·No. 1D10-0917·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Farnam v. U.S. Sugar Corp., 9 So.3d 41, 42 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (holding that JCC could reject parties’ stipulation where competent, substantial evidence supported a contrary finding).

WEBSTER, LEWIS, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Panzer Law, Pa v. US Sugar Corporation, 45 So. 3d 544, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 15132, 2010 WL 3929068 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

45 So. 3d 544 (Panzer Law, Pa v. US Sugar Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farnam v. U.S. Sugar Corp.
9 So. 3d 41 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)