Panuzio v. Mazziotti, No. Cvnh 9703-8121 (Oct. 23, 1997)

Connecticut Superior Court

Panuzio v. Mazziotti, No. Cvnh 9703-8121 (Oct. 23, 1997)

1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 10592

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedOctober 23, 1997

DocketNo. CVNH 9703-8121

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 10592 (Panuzio v. Mazziotti, No. Cvnh 9703-8121 (Oct. 23, 1997)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Panuzio v. Mazziotti, No. Cvnh 9703-8121 (Oct. 23, 1997), 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 10592 (Colo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CT Page 10593 This is an action for unpaid rent and use and occupancy in connection with the lease of commercial property. The court finds the issues for the plaintiffs. The court finds that damages as follows:

Unpaid rent for December, 1996 $1,500.00 Use and Occupancy, January and February, 1997 3,000.00 Damages for March, 1997 800.00 Attorneys fees and costs of eviction action 1,117.80 Attorneys fees for this action 1,500.00

Damages for March, 1997 are awarded pursuant to Rokalor, Inc.v. Connecticut Eating Enterprises, Inc., 18 Conn. App. 384,388-390, 558 A.2d 265 (1989); see also K K Realty Associates v.Gagnon, 33 Conn. App. 815. 820, 639 A.2d 524 (1994); Public Act No. 97-231 § 1. I have previously held that it is the defendant's burden to prove that the plaintiff did not mitigate damages. DeMatteo v. Villano, Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven, Housing Session, No. CVNH 9604-7493 (July 14, 1997). Attorneys' fees are awarded pursuant to the third paragraph of the parties' lease in the absence of any claim that the fees claimed were not "incurred by the Landlord in enforcing any of the obligations under this lease."

Judgment may enter for the plaintiff against the named defendant only¹ for $7,917.80, plus taxable costs

BY THE COURT

Bruce L. LevinJudge of the Superior Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CT Page 10593 This is an action for unpaid rent and use and occupancy in connection with the lease of commercial property. The court finds the issues for the plaintiffs. The court finds that damages as follows:

Unpaid rent for December, 1996 $1,500.00 Use and Occupancy, January and February, 1997 3,000.00 Damages for March, 1997 800.00 Attorneys fees and costs of eviction action 1,117.80 Attorneys fees for this action 1,500.00

Damages for March, 1997 are awarded pursuant to Rokalor, Inc.v. Connecticut Eating Enterprises, Inc., 18 Conn. App. 384,388-390, 558 A.2d 265 (1989); see also K K Realty Associates v.Gagnon, 33 Conn. App. 815. 820, 639 A.2d 524 (1994); Public Act No. 97-231 § 1. I have previously held that it is the defendant's burden to prove that the plaintiff did not mitigate damages. DeMatteo v. Villano, Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven, Housing Session, No. CVNH 9604-7493 (July 14, 1997). Attorneys' fees are awarded pursuant to the third paragraph of the parties' lease in the absence of any claim that the fees claimed were not "incurred by the Landlord in enforcing any of the obligations under this lease."

Judgment may enter for the plaintiff against the named defendant only¹ for $7,917.80, plus taxable costs

BY THE COURT

Bruce L. LevinJudge of the Superior Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 10592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/panuzio-v-mazziotti-no-cvnh-9703-8121-oct-23-1997-connsuperct-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack