Pantuso Motors, Inc. v. Corestates Bank, N.A.
This text of 779 A.2d 1142 (Pantuso Motors, Inc. v. Corestates Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 22nd day of August, 2001, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, No. 181 M.D. Alloc. Dkt.2000, is granted limited to the following issues:
1. Did the Superior Court err by holding that the statute of limitations applicable to a cause of action under 21 P.S. § 682 begins to run anew with each new request for entry of satisfaction of a mortgage?
2. Did the Superior Court err by holding that a plaintiff who makes multiple requests for entry of satisfaction of a single mortgage may obtain an award of damages under 21 P.S. § 682 for each such request?
The Petition for Allowance of Appeal, No. 183 M.D. Alloc. Dkt.2000, is also granted limited to the following issue:
1. Whether successive demands for satisfaction of an open judgment either revive the initial cause of action or constitute a new and distinct cause of action under 42 Pa.C.S. § 8104?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
779 A.2d 1142, 566 Pa. 212, 2001 Pa. LEXIS 1818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pantuso-motors-inc-v-corestates-bank-na-pa-2001.