Pantry Pride Enterprises, Inc. v. Velazquez

503 So. 2d 429, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 666, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11994
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 3, 1987
DocketNo. 86-1325
StatusPublished

This text of 503 So. 2d 429 (Pantry Pride Enterprises, Inc. v. Velazquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pantry Pride Enterprises, Inc. v. Velazquez, 503 So. 2d 429, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 666, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11994 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment for compensatory damages. See Ferguson v. Seaboard Air Line R.R., 400 F.2d 473, 475 (5th Cir.1968) (“Florida adheres to the ‘election of remedy’ theory”). We reverse the award of punitive damages, however, upon a holding that the evidence taken in the light most favorable to Velazquez is, nevertheless, insufficient to establish the necessary willful and wanton misconduct required by law. See White Constr. Co. v. Dupont, 455 So.2d 1026 (Fla.1984); Ten Assocs. v. Brunson, 492 So.2d 1149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ten Associates v. Brunson
492 So. 2d 1149 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
White Const. Co., Inc. v. Dupont
455 So. 2d 1026 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 So. 2d 429, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 666, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pantry-pride-enterprises-inc-v-velazquez-fladistctapp-1987.