Pantoja, Carlos
This text of Pantoja, Carlos (Pantoja, Carlos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NOS. WR-86,535-01 & 86,535-02
EX PARTE CARLOS PANTOJA, Applicant
ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NOS. D-1-DC-07-300101-A & D-1-DC-07-300047-A IN THE 299TH DISTRICT COURT FROM TRAVIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex
parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of five counts
of aggravated robbery and sentenced to imprisonment for five, ten, twelve, and two terms of eighteen
years. He did not appeal his convictions.
Applicant contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Applicant has alleged
facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte
Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts 2
are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the
trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to
respond to Applicant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims. The trial court may use any means
set out in TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).
If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent.
If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an
attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 26.04.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether counsel’s
conduct was deficient and, but for counsel’s alleged deficient conduct, Applicant would not have
pleaded guilty but instead insisted on a trial. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact
and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims
for habeas corpus relief.
These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues.
The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all
affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or
deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall
be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.
Filed: April 5, 2017 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pantoja, Carlos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pantoja-carlos-texcrimapp-2017.