Pantlin v. Heicklen Farms, Inc.
70 A.D.2d 1047, 420 N.Y.S.2d 273
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 1, 1979
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished
This text of 70 A.D.2d 1047 (Pantlin v. Heicklen Farms, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pantlin v. Heicklen Farms, Inc., 70 A.D.2d 1047, 420 N.Y.S.2d 273 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).
Opinion
— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the opinion at Special Term, Boomer, J. We do not read Drago v Buonagurio (46 NY2d 778) as limiting the provisions of section 487 of the Judiciary Law. (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court— [1048]*1048reargument.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Drago v. Buonagurio
386 N.E.2d 821 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 A.D.2d 1047, 420 N.Y.S.2d 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pantlin-v-heicklen-farms-inc-nyappdiv-1979.