Panther Air Boat Corp. v. MacMillan-Buchanan & Kelly Insurance Agency, Inc.

531 So. 2d 333, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 600, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1053, 1988 WL 101548
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 29, 1988·No. No. 72080·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

KOGAN, Justice.

We have for review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Panther Air Boat Corp. v. MacMillan-Buchanan & Kelly Insurance Agency, 520 So.2d 601, 604 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), in which that court certified to us the following question of great public importance:

For purposes of the professional malpractice statute, is an insurance agent a professional?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently addressed this issue in Pierce v. AALL Insurance Inc., 531 So.2d 84 (Fla.1988), and answered the certified question in the negative. We held that a profession was defined as "a calling requiring, as a minimum for licensing under the laws of Florida, specialized knowledge and academic preparation amounting to at [334]*334least a four-year university level degree in the field of study specifically related to that calling.” Pierce, at 88. We are bound by that holding, and accordingly we answer the certified question in this case in the negative and quash the decision of the district court.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, BARKETT and GRIMES, JJ., concur. McDONALD, j., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Panther Air Boat Corp. v. MacMillan-Buchanan & Kelly Insurance Agency, Inc., 531 So. 2d 333, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 600, 1988 Fla. LEXIS 1053, 1988 WL 101548 (Fla. 1988).

531 So. 2d 333 (Panther Air Boat Corp. v. MacMillan-Buchanan & Kelly Insurance Agency, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garden v. Frier
602 So. 2d 1273 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)