Pantel v. F. A. Heckendorf, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Pantel v. F. A. Heckendorf, Inc.

435 P.2d 761, 164 Colo. 480

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided January 8, 1968·No. No. 22773·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs in error are here seeking reversal of a judgment entered against them in the amount of $928.52. This judgment resulted from the fact that they became sureties on an appeal bond in an action originally filed in the county court in which F. A. Heckendorf, Inc., recovered a judgment against Arthur R. White.

[481] The Pantels argue that the appeal bond which was executed by them was a nullity, and, further, that when the district court conducted a trial de novo and entered a judgment against White, and ultimately against them, it was without jurisdiction. There is no merit to the argument of plaintiffs in error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Pringle not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs in error are here seeking reversal of a judgment entered against them in the amount of $928.52. This judgment resulted from the fact that they became sureties on an appeal bond in an action originally filed in the county court in which F. A. Heckendorf, Inc., recovered a judgment against Arthur R. White.

[481] The Pantels argue that the appeal bond which was executed by them was a nullity, and, further, that when the district court conducted a trial de novo and entered a judgment against White, and ultimately against them, it was without jurisdiction. There is no merit to the argument of plaintiffs in error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Pringle not participating.

Pantel v. F. A. Heckendorf, Inc., 435 P.2d 761, 164 Colo. 480 (Colo. 1968).

Pincite

435 P.2d 761 (Pantel v. F. A. Heckendorf, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.