Pante v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pante v. Goord

32 A.D.3d 1084, 820 N.Y.S.2d 819

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 21, 2006

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 32 A.D.3d 1084 (Pante v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pante v. Goord, 32 A.D.3d 1084, 820 N.Y.S.2d 819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which directed that petitioner be placed in administrative segregation.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination placing him in administrative segregation. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Johnson v Goord, 283 AD2d 707, 708 [2001]).

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which directed that petitioner be placed in administrative segregation.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination placing him in administrative segregation. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively reversed and that all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled and is no longer aggrieved, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Johnson v Goord, 283 AD2d 707, 708 [2001]).

Crew III, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.3d 1084, 820 N.Y.S.2d 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pante-v-goord-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack