Pantchev
This text of Pantchev (Pantchev) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
GUEORGUI HRISTOV PANTCHEV, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-2786 (UNA) ) MOLLY C. DWYER, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
Memorandum Opinion
This matter is before the court on initial review of Plaintiff’s application for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, and pro se complaint, ECF No. 1. The court will grant the
application, and for the reasons discussed below, dismiss the complaint without prejudice.
“A complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to
relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl.
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A complaint that lacks “an arguable basis either in
law or in fact” is frivolous. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). And the court cannot
exercise subject matter jurisdiction over a frivolous complaint. Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528,
536–37 (1974) (“Over the years, this Court has repeatedly held that the federal courts are without
power to entertain claims otherwise within their jurisdiction if they are ‘so attenuated and
unsubstantial as to be absolutely devoid of merit.’”) (quoting Newburyport Water Co. v.
Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 579 (1904)); Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1010 (D.C. Cir.
2009) (explaining that courts may dismiss cases “for patent insubstantiality,” including where
plaintiff allegedly “was subjected to a campaign of surveillance and harassment deriving from
uncertain origins”). Consequently, a court is obligated to dismiss a complaint as frivolous “when
1 the facts alleged rise to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible.” Denton v. Hernandez,
504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992).
The complaint consists of scattered insults and inflammatory language. Its allegations are
conclusory and lack any factual basis. The complaint is frivolous, and therefore must be dismissed.
A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.
DATE: April 13, 2026 AMIR H. ALI United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pantchev, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pantchev-dcd-2026.