Pantano v. Pantano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pantano v. Pantano

52 A.D.2d 843, 383 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12674

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 843 (Pantano v. Pantano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pantano v. Pantano, 52 A.D.2d 843, 383 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action in which the plaintiff husband was granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 24, 1975, which denied her motion to compel plaintiff to pay alimony in the amount provided for in the said judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The judgment of divorce provided for alimony of $150 per week. Thereafter, plaintiff moved for a downward modification and his motion was disposed of by stipulation. Pursuant thereto Special Term, [844]*844on April 28, 1971, fixed alimony at $100 per week and directed that neither party apply for any further modification of the alimony award prior to December 31, 1973. No such application has been made since that date; therefore, the alimony payable to defendant is $100 per week, which plaintiff has been paying. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action in which the plaintiff husband was granted a judgment of divorce, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 24, 1975, which denied her motion to compel plaintiff to pay alimony in the amount provided for in the said judgment. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The judgment of divorce provided for alimony of $150 per week. Thereafter, plaintiff moved for a downward modification and his motion was disposed of by stipulation. Pursuant thereto Special Term, [844]*844on April 28, 1971, fixed alimony at $100 per week and directed that neither party apply for any further modification of the alimony award prior to December 31, 1973. No such application has been made since that date; therefore, the alimony payable to defendant is $100 per week, which plaintiff has been paying. Cohalan, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 843, 383 N.Y.S.2d 557, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pantano-v-pantano-nyappdiv-1976.