Pantaleo v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pantaleo v. Board of Education

25 A.D.2d 752, 269 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4564

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 4, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 752 (Pantaleo v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pantaleo v. Board of Education, 25 A.D.2d 752, 269 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4564 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to require the Board of Education of the City of New York to reinstate petitioner to her position as a teacher, the board appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 30, 1965 upon reargument, as adhered to the court’s original decision [46 Misc 2d 334] and the judgment entered thereon, dated April 8, 1965, which granted the petition and directed the board to restore petitioner to her position, effective January 2, 1964, the date on which she had been placed on inactive status pursuant to subdivision 7a of section 106 of the board’s by-laws. Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law, without costs, judgment vacated and petition dismissed, without costs. The board acted within its power (Brown v. Board of Educ., 23 A D 2d 850 affd. 16 N Y 2d 1021).

Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ.. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR to require the Board of Education of the City of New York to reinstate petitioner to her position as a teacher, the board appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 30, 1965 upon reargument, as adhered to the court’s original decision [46 Misc 2d 334] and the judgment entered thereon, dated April 8, 1965, which granted the petition and directed the board to restore petitioner to her position, effective January 2, 1964, the date on which she had been placed on inactive status pursuant to subdivision 7a of section 106 of the board’s by-laws. Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the law, without costs, judgment vacated and petition dismissed, without costs. The board acted within its power (Brown v. Board of Educ., 23 A D 2d 850 affd. 16 N Y 2d 1021).

Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ.. concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 752, 269 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pantaleo-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack