Pantages v. Metropolitan Dade County Electrical Contractors Examining Board

209 So. 2d 706, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5685
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 1968
DocketNo. 67-805
StatusPublished

This text of 209 So. 2d 706 (Pantages v. Metropolitan Dade County Electrical Contractors Examining Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pantages v. Metropolitan Dade County Electrical Contractors Examining Board, 209 So. 2d 706, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5685 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant petitioned for a writ of certiorari in the circuit court seeking review of an action of the Metropolitan Dade County Electrical Contractors Examining Board. The writ was denied and the petition dismissed with prejudice on August 11, 1966, after a hearing before the circuit court. No appeal was taken from that judgment.

Thereafter petitioner-appellant moved in the circuit court, pursuant to Rule 1.540(b) (4), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 31 F.S.A., for an order vacating the judgment of August 11, 1966. In his motion the appellant asserted that the judgment of the circuit court was void because the action of the Metropolitan Dade County Electrical Contractors Examining Board was void under the law established by this court in Florida State Board of Dental Examiners v. Graham, Fla.App. 1966, 187 So.2d 104.

Without determining whether the action of the Examining Board was void, voidable, erroneous, or lawful, we hold that the trial judge correctly determined that the appellant’s motion did not state a ground for relief under Rule 1.540(b) (4), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Cf. Bodner v. Blackwelder, Fla.App.1965, 181 So.2d 373. The circuit court had jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties and followed established procedure; it entered a final judgment which was not timely appealed. Therefore, the judgment was not void.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bodner v. Blackwelder
181 So. 2d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Florida State Board v. Graham
187 So. 2d 104 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 So. 2d 706, 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pantages-v-metropolitan-dade-county-electrical-contractors-examining-board-fladistctapp-1968.