Pansy v. Preate
This text of 61 F.3d 896 (Pansy v. Preate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
61 F.3d 896
John A. Pansy
v.
Ernest D. Preate, Jr., John Burfete, Lois Lichtenwalner,
Michael Crossin, Joseph Farkus, Charles Read, Thomas
Gallagher, John Purcell, other unidentified special agents
with Pennsylvania's Office of Attorney General
NO. 94-7664
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
June 20, 1995
Appeal From: M.D.Pa., No. 92-00778,
Conaboy, J.,
870 F.Supp. 612
AFFIRMED.
Federal Reporter. The Third Circuit provides by rule for the reporting of opinions having 'precedential or institutional value. An opinion which appears to have value only to the trial court or the parties is ordinarily not published.' The Federal Reporter tables are prepared from lists of cases terminated by judgment orders, unpublished per curiam opinions and unpublished signed opinions, indicating the disposition of each case, transmitted by the Court. Third Circuit Rules, App. 1, Internal Operating Procedures, Ch. 5, sec. 5.1, 28 U.S.C.A.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 F.3d 896, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17868, 1995 WL 406642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pansy-v-preate-ca3-1995.