Pansey v. RKO General, Inc.
104 A.D.2d 543, 482 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19989
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pansey v. RKO General, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 102 A.D.2d 762 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 13, 1984·Published
Opinion
— Motion for clarification granted to the extent of amending the decretal paragraph of this court’s order, entered on June 26, 1984 (102 AD2d 762), to provide that counsel’s payment to plaintiff’s attorney shall constitute compliance with the intent of this court’s order. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Carro, Fein and Alexander, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pansey v. RKO General, Inc., 104 A.D.2d 543, 482 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19989 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).
104 A.D.2d 543 (Pansey v. RKO General, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.