Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Panozzo v. Allstate Ins.

Panozzo v. Allstate Ins.

762 N.E.2d 369, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1451, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 246
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 6, 2002
Docket01-1955
StatusPublished

This text of 762 N.E.2d 369 (Panozzo v. Allstate Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Panozzo v. Allstate Ins., 762 N.E.2d 369, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1451, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 246 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 79083. On discretionary appeal and motion to consolidate case with 01-1786, Lemm v. The Hartford, Franklin App. No. 01AP-251. Appeal granted and motion granted for purposes of oral argument and decision.

Cook, J., would allow but would hold the cause for the decision in 01-1786. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 N.E.2d 369, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1451, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/panozzo-v-allstate-ins-ohio-2002.