Panowicz v. Hancock

Fourth Circuit

Panowicz v. Hancock

670 F. App'x 83

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 24, 2016·No. No. 15-2376·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Panowicz seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting summary judgment for the defendant Sharon L. Hancock, denying leave to amend, and denying his motions for reconsideration and to reopen sovereign immunity issues. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Panowicz v. Hancock, No. 8:11-cv-02417-DKC, 2015 WL 4231712 (D. Md. July 9, 2015; Oct. 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mark A. Panowicz seeks to appeal the district court’s orders granting summary judgment for the defendant Sharon L. Hancock, denying leave to amend, and denying his motions for reconsideration and to reopen sovereign immunity issues. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Panowicz v. Hancock, No. 8:11-cv-02417-DKC, 2015 WL 4231712 (D. Md. July 9, 2015; Oct. 5, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Panowicz v. Hancock, 670 F. App'x 83 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 83 (Panowicz v. Hancock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.