Pannier v. State
This text of 384 So. 2d 44 (Pannier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. Castle v. State, 305 So.2d 794 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), affirmed 330 So.2d 10 (Fla.1976); Wildie v. State, 326 So.2d 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
384 So. 2d 44, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pannier-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.