Pannier v. State

384 So. 2d 44, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23548
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 27, 1980·No. No. 80-973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g), having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. Castle v. State, 305 So.2d 794 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), affirmed 330 So.2d 10 (Fla.1976); Wildie v. State, 326 So.2d 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pannier v. State, 384 So. 2d 44, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23548 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

384 So. 2d 44 (Pannier v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pannier v. State
395 So. 2d 289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)