Pannier v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pannier v. State

340 So. 2d 1259, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16133

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 23, 1976

DocketNo. 76-452

StatusPublished

This text of 340 So. 2d 1259 (Pannier v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pannier v. State, 340 So. 2d 1259, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16133 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty of assault with intent to commit robbery and assault with intent to commit rape. He was sentenced to two fifteen year sentences to be served concurrently. On this appeal, the single point presented urges that the court erred in sentencing the defendant for both assault with intent to commit robbery and assault with intent to commit rape because both charges arose out of the same transaction. See Yost v. State, 243 So.2d 469 (Fla.3d DCA 1971). The cited case is inapplicable to the facts of the instant case in that the record clearly shows two separate assaults. Therefore, the defendant may be sentenced for the separate offenses. See Booth v. State, 332 So.2d 157 (Fla.lst DCA 1976); and Amerson v. State, 303 So.2d 377 (Fla.lst DCA 1974).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty of assault with intent to commit robbery and assault with intent to commit rape. He was sentenced to two fifteen year sentences to be served concurrently. On this appeal, the single point presented urges that the court erred in sentencing the defendant for both assault with intent to commit robbery and assault with intent to commit rape because both charges arose out of the same transaction. See Yost v. State, 243 So.2d 469 (Fla.3d DCA 1971). The cited case is inapplicable to the facts of the instant case in that the record clearly shows two separate assaults. Therefore, the defendant may be sentenced for the separate offenses. See Booth v. State, 332 So.2d 157 (Fla.lst DCA 1976); and Amerson v. State, 303 So.2d 377 (Fla.lst DCA 1974).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

340 So. 2d 1259, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 16133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pannier-v-state-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack