Pannell v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of Pannell v. Commissioner of Social Security (Pannell v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
JAMES PANNELL,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 23-CV-02912-SPM
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant. ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES McGLYNN, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion to Award Attorney Fees and Expenses Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) [hereinafter EAJA] filed by Plaintiff James Pannell and Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (See Doc. 31). The parties move for entry of an agreed order granting Plaintiff Pannell $9,000.00 for attorney fees and expenses in this case. (See id.). The Court finds that Plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to an award of attorney fees pursuant to the EAJA. The Court further finds that the amount sought is reasonable and appropriate. This award shall fully and completely satisfy any and all claims for fees and expenses that may have been payable to Plaintiff in this matter pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Per the parties’ agreement, this motion does not include Plaintiff’s costs, and Plaintiff may file a separate bill of costs. The parties’ Joint Motion for Award of Attorney Fees (Doc. 31) is GRANTED. The Court awards Plaintiff attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $9,000.00 (nine thousand dollars and zero cents). The amount awarded is payable to Plaintiff and is subject to set-off for any
debt owed by Plaintiff to the United States in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). See also Harrington v. Berryhill, 906 F.3d 561 (7th Cir. 2018). However, any part of the award that is not subject to set-off to pay Plaintiff’s pre- existing debt to the United States shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment executed by Plaintiff. If Defendant can verify that Plaintiff does not owe a pre-existing debt to the government subject to the offset, Defendant will direct that the award be made payable to Cody Marvin pursuant to
the EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff. If payment is mailed, as compared to electronically deposited, it shall be mailed to counsel’s address of record: Marvin & Associates, P.C. 630 Davis Street, Suite 300 Evanston, IL 60201
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: January 13, 2025
s/ Stephen P. McGlynn STEPHEN P. McGLYNN U.S. District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pannell v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pannell-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ilsd-2025.