Pankowski v. State
This text of 2014 ND 186 (Pankowski v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 10/28/14 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2014 ND 186
David Thomas Pankowski, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
No. 20140094
Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald L. Jorgensen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Thomas J. Glass, 418 East Rosser Avenue, Suite 102, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Ladd R. Erickson, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 1108, Washburn, N.D. 58577-1108, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Pankowski v. State
[¶1] David Pankowski appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. Pankowski claimed he was entitled to post-conviction relief because he received ineffective assistance of counsel prior to entering his guilty plea. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court did not err in dismissing Pankowski’s application for post-conviction relief.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 ND 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pankowski-v-state-nd-2014.