Pankiewicz v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Pankiewicz v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.

252 A.2d 41, 105 N.J. Super. 287, 1968 N.J. Super. LEXIS 369

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedNovember 14, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.2d 41 (Pankiewicz v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pankiewicz v. New Jersey Bell Telephone Co., 252 A.2d 41, 105 N.J. Super. 287, 1968 N.J. Super. LEXIS 369 (N.J. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this proceeding for workmen’s com-

pensation death benefits, which resulted from the death of petitioner’s husband by heart attack, both the judge of compensation and the County Court judge in a 'de novo review, found that decedent’s death was causally related to his work effort. We conclude that the findings of the County Court could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in the record, considering the proofs as a whole. Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N. J. 589, 599 (1965).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this proceeding for workmen’s com-

pensation death benefits, which resulted from the death of petitioner’s husband by heart attack, both the judge of compensation and the County Court judge in a 'de novo review, found that decedent’s death was causally related to his work effort. We conclude that the findings of the County Court could reasonably have been reached on sufficient credible evidence present in the record, considering the proofs as a whole. Close v. Kordulak Bros., 44 N. J. 589, 599 (1965).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.2d 41, 105 N.J. Super. 287, 1968 N.J. Super. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pankiewicz-v-new-jersey-bell-telephone-co-njsuperctappdiv-1968.