Pankey v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Pankey v. State

444 P.3d 458

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 15, 2019

DocketNo. 79041

StatusPublished

This text of 444 P.3d 458 (Pankey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pankey v. State, 444 P.3d 458 (Neb. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order dismissing a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Elliott A. Sattler, Judge.

This court's preliminary review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court served notice of entry of the order dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus on February 1, 2018. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until June 17, 2019, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State , 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from an order dismissing a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Elliott A. Sattler, Judge.

This court's preliminary review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the district court served notice of entry of the order dismissing the petition for writ of habeas corpus on February 1, 2018. Appellant did not file the notice of appeal, however, until June 17, 2019, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). "[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court." Lozada v. State , 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

444 P.3d 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pankey-v-state-nev-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack