Pankey (Ronel) Vs. State
This text of Pankey (Ronel) Vs. State (Pankey (Ronel) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RONEL DENAIR PANKEY, No. 79485 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED Respondent. SEP 2 0 2019 EL1ZAT BROM CLERKß SUfiEMCOURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUT( CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for specific performance. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Elliott A. Sattler, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for specific performance in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
, J. Hardesty
jeleiji$G40 , J. J. Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge Ronel Denair Pankey Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 19-YMcv p) 1447A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pankey (Ronel) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pankey-ronel-vs-state-nev-2019.