Pankey (Ronel) Vs. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RONEL DENAIR PANKEY, No. 79485 Appellant,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
FILED
Respondent. SEP 2 0 2019 EL1ZAT BROM CLERKß SUfiEMCOURT
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUT( CLERK
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for specific performance. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Elliott A. Sattler, Judge.
Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for specific performance in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
, J.
Hardesty
jeleiji$G40 , J. J.
Stiglich Silver
cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge Ronel Denair Pankey Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 19-YMcv
p) 1447A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pankey (Ronel) Vs. State (Pankey (Ronel) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.