Panizza v. 7/9 Carmine St. Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Panizza v. 7/9 Carmine St. Realty Corp.

260 A.D. 1000, 24 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 13, 1940·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff against the defendant, 7/9 Carmine St. Realty Corp., and with costs to the defendant Reisberg against the plaintiff. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse on plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment in favor of the defendant-contractor. [1001]*1001Reisberg, and to grant a new trial as to that defendant, on the ground that, on this record, the jury’s verdict exonerating that defendant is inconsistent with the evidence and against the weight of the credible evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff against the defendant, 7/9 Carmine St. Realty Corp., and with costs to the defendant Reisberg against the plaintiff. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse on plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment in favor of the defendant-contractor. [1001]*1001Reisberg, and to grant a new trial as to that defendant, on the ground that, on this record, the jury’s verdict exonerating that defendant is inconsistent with the evidence and against the weight of the credible evidence.

Panizza v. 7/9 Carmine St. Realty Corp., 260 A.D. 1000, 24 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

260 A.D. 1000 (Panizza v. 7/9 Carmine St. Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.