Panizza v. 7/9 Carmine St. Realty Corp.

260 A.D. 1000, 24 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769

This text of 260 A.D. 1000 (Panizza v. 7/9 Carmine St. Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Panizza v. 7/9 Carmine St. Realty Corp., 260 A.D. 1000, 24 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff against the defendant, 7/9 Carmine St. Realty Corp., and with costs to the defendant Reisberg against the plaintiff. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Dore and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse on plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment in favor of the defendant-contractor. [1001]*1001Reisberg, and to grant a new trial as to that defendant, on the ground that, on this record, the jury’s verdict exonerating that defendant is inconsistent with the evidence and against the weight of the credible evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 1000, 24 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/panizza-v-79-carmine-st-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1940.