Paniplus Co. v. Higgins
80 F.2d 1017, 17 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 174
This text of 80 F.2d 1017 (Paniplus Co. v. Higgins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Paniplus Co. v. Higgins, 80 F.2d 1017, 17 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 174 (2d Cir. 1936).
Opinion
Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the District Court, with directions to enter a decree enjoining collection of the tax. An appropriate order shall be entered directing the repayment to the plaintiff of any cash, bonds, or funds which have been impounded or deposited below. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., v. Fontenot, 56 S.Ct. 374, 80 L.Ed. —, January 13, 1936.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rickert Rice Mills, Inc. v. Fontenot
297 U.S. 110 (Supreme Court, 1936)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
80 F.2d 1017, 17 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paniplus-co-v-higgins-ca2-1936.