Panico v. Young
386 N.E.2d 1334, 46 N.Y.2d 847, 414 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1805
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; Matter of Brooklyn Hosp. v Lennon, 45 NY2d 820).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Panico v. Young, 386 N.E.2d 1334, 46 N.Y.2d 847, 414 N.Y.S.2d 313, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1805 (N.Y. 1979).
386 N.E.2d 1334 (Panico v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Giblin v. Nassau County Medical Center
459 N.E.2d 856 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Curley v. Dilworth
96 A.D.2d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
People v. Montesano
445 N.E.2d 197 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Dercole
419 N.E.2d 869 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
In Re the Arbitration Between Dobbs Ferry Union Free School District & Dobbs Ferry United Teachers
414 N.E.2d 398 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Landau v. Hynes
400 N.E.2d 321 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
Ring v. Langdon
69 A.D.2d 998 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)