Panice v. Panice

635 So. 2d 1078, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4153, 1994 WL 162750
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 3, 1994·No. No. 93-1745·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Casto v. Casto, 508 So.2d 330, 334 (Fla.1987); Kanouse v. Kanouse, 549 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); O’Connor v. O’Connor, 435 So.2d 344 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Baker v. Baker, 394 So.2d 465 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 402 So.2d 607 (Fla.1981); Buben-ik v. Bubenik, 392 So.2d 943 (Fla. 3d DCA [1079]*10791980); Zakoor v. Zakoor, 240 So.2d 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Panice v. Panice, 635 So. 2d 1078, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4153, 1994 WL 162750 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

635 So. 2d 1078 (Panice v. Panice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zakoor v. Zakoor
240 So. 2d 193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Casto v. Casto
508 So. 2d 330 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Bubenik v. Bubenik
392 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Baker v. Baker
394 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
O'Connor v. O'Connor
435 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Kanouse v. Kanouse
549 So. 2d 1035 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)