Paniagua v. State

491 S.W.2d 128, 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2235
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 7, 1973
DocketNo. 46482
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 491 S.W.2d 128 (Paniagua v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paniagua v. State, 491 S.W.2d 128, 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2235 (Tex. 1973).

Opinion

OPINION

DOUGLAS, Judge.

This is an appeal by sureties from a judgment forfeiting an appearance bond. Rule 414 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure require that an appellant’s brief be filed with the appellate court within thirty days after filing of the transcript. This procedure is applicable in the appeal of bond forfeiture cases in the Court of Criminal Appeals. Article 44.44, Vernon’s Ann. C.C.P.

No brief was filed in this case within the time required. No good cause is shown for such failure. See Young v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 928, and Bryant v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 141.

For the reasons stated, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rangel v. State
579 S.W.2d 9 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
491 S.W.2d 128, 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paniagua-v-state-texcrimapp-1973.