Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Jones
This text of 495 P.2d 982 (Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These four appeals, arising in the nineteenth judicial district of Kansas, involve a single question: Are the state director of property valuation, the state board of tax appeals, the state board of equalization and the individual members, the attorney and the secretary of those boards, indispensable, necessary or proper parties defendant in a local action to recover taxes paid under protest?
The question was fully considered and answered in the negative in Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Bender, 208 Kan. 135, 490 P. 2d 399, under which authority the judgments appealed from are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
495 P.2d 982, 209 Kan. 12, 1972 Kan. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/panhandle-eastern-pipe-line-co-v-jones-kan-1972.