Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Jones
Opinion
These four appeals, arising in the nineteenth judicial district of Kansas, involve a single question: Are the state director of property valuation, the state board of tax appeals, the state board of equalization and the individual members, the attorney and the secretary of those boards, indispensable, necessary or proper parties defendant in a local action to recover taxes paid under protest?
The question was fully considered and answered in the negative in Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Bender, 208 Kan. 135, 490 P. 2d 399, under which authority the judgments appealed from are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
495 P.2d 982 (Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.