Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission, County of Wayne, Michigan, Michigan Public Service Commission, Intervenors

348 F.2d 340, 23 Oil & Gas Rep. 302, 121 U.S. App. D.C. 111, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5169
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided June 22, 1965·No. 19016·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The prior history in this court of this case is found in City of Detroit, Michigan v. Federal Power Comm’n, 97 U.S. App.D.C. 260, 230 F.2d 810, cert. denied, 352 U.S. 829, 77 S.Ct. 34, 1 L.Ed.2d 48, and in Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 113 U.S.App.D.C. 94, 305 F.2d 763, cert. denied, 372 U.S. 916, 83 S.Ct. 719, 9 L.Ed.2d 722. The present petition is for review of orders of the Commission following our remand to the Commission by our judgment in the case last cited. We affirm the present orders as within the Commission’s authority validly exercised as a result of the proceedings upon the remand.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission, County of Wayne, Michigan, Michigan Public Service Commission, Intervenors, 348 F.2d 340, 23 Oil & Gas Rep. 302, 121 U.S. App. D.C. 111, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5169 (D.C. Cir. 1965).

348 F.2d 340 (Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission, County of Wayne, Michigan, Michigan Public Service Commission, Intervenors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Songeni
Superior Court of Guam, 2009
Arnold v. United States
511 A.2d 399 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1986)
Dobson v. United States
426 A.2d 361 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1981)
Ernest L. Stith v. United States
361 F.2d 535 (D.C. Circuit, 1966)