Pangilinan v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

Superior Court of Guam

Pangilinan v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance

1 Guam 377

CourtSuperior Court of Guam

DecidedNovember 15, 1976

DocketCivil No. 662-76

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Guam 377 (Pangilinan v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Guam primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pangilinan v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance, 1 Guam 377 (superctguam 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

BENSON, Judge

ORDER

This matter came before the court on the 1st day of October, 1976, on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and on plaintiffs’ motion requesting permission to serve a supplemental complaint upon defendant. Plaintiffs appeared by their attorney, Mr. Howard G. Trapp, and defendant appeared by their attorney, Mr. J. Bradley Klemm. After oral arguments of counsel, the matter was submitted for decision, and the court after having fully considered the matter and being fully advised in the premises:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. That the. motion to dismiss against defendant be, and hereby is, denied; ■

2. That the motion for permission to serve supplemental complaint be, and hereby is, granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BENSON, Judge

ORDER

This matter came before the court on the 1st day of October, 1976, on defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, and on plaintiffs’ motion requesting permission to serve a supplemental complaint upon defendant. Plaintiffs appeared by their attorney, Mr. Howard G. Trapp, and defendant appeared by their attorney, Mr. J. Bradley Klemm. After oral arguments of counsel, the matter was submitted for decision, and the court after having fully considered the matter and being fully advised in the premises:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. That the. motion to dismiss against defendant be, and hereby is, denied; ■

2. That the motion for permission to serve supplemental complaint be, and hereby is, granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Guam 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pangilinan-v-st-paul-fire-marine-insurance-superctguam-1976.