Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Pangburn v. State

Pangburn v. State

132 So. 3d 299, 2014 WL 51746, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 157
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 8, 2014·No. Nos. 4D13-887, 4D13-888·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our complete review of the record reveals that the only issue which might merit relief was not preserved for appellate review. See Lachenauer v. State, 117 So.3d 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); St. Cyr v. State, 106 So.3d 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Thus, we affirm without prejudice to the filing of an appropriate collateral motion.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pangburn v. State, 132 So. 3d 299, 2014 WL 51746, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 157 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

132 So. 3d 299 (Pangburn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Cyr v. State
106 So. 3d 487 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Lachenauer v. State
117 So. 3d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)