Pangburn v. State

132 So. 3d 299, 2014 WL 51746, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 157
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 8, 2014
DocketNos. 4D13-887, 4D13-888
StatusPublished

This text of 132 So. 3d 299 (Pangburn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pangburn v. State, 132 So. 3d 299, 2014 WL 51746, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 157 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our complete review of the record reveals that the only issue which might merit relief was not preserved for appellate review. See Lachenauer v. State, 117 So.3d 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013); St. Cyr v. State, 106 So.3d 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013). Thus, we affirm without prejudice to the filing of an appropriate collateral motion.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Cyr v. State
106 So. 3d 487 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Lachenauer v. State
117 So. 3d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 So. 3d 299, 2014 WL 51746, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pangburn-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.