Pangburn v. Rahm

230 S.W.3d 62, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1119, 2007 WL 2301411

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 14, 2007·No. WD 67357·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mr. James A. Rahm and James A. Rahm L.L.C., appeal the trial court’s judgment awarding Mr. Pangburn attorney fees.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pangburn v. Rahm, 230 S.W.3d 62, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1119, 2007 WL 2301411 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

230 S.W.3d 62 (Pangburn v. Rahm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.