Pangburn v. Rahm
230 S.W.3d 62, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1119, 2007 WL 2301411
This text of 230 S.W.3d 62 (Pangburn v. Rahm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pangburn v. Rahm, 230 S.W.3d 62, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1119, 2007 WL 2301411 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
Opinion
ORDER
Mr. James A. Rahm and James A. Rahm L.L.C., appeal the trial court’s judgment awarding Mr. Pangburn attorney fees.
For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Schoenecke v. Schoenecke
230 S.W.3d 62 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
230 S.W.3d 62, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1119, 2007 WL 2301411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pangburn-v-rahm-moctapp-2007.