Pangburn v. Bradshaw

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pangburn v. Bradshaw

39 So. 3d 578, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11421, 2010 WL 3037262

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 5, 2010

Docket4D10-3160

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 39 So. 3d 578 (Pangburn v. Bradshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pangburn v. Bradshaw, 39 So. 3d 578, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11421, 2010 WL 3037262 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant Brandon Pangburn’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. Pangburn is currently in jail awaiting placement in a residential treatment program. No authority has been identified to support his detention. Compare § 916.107(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). The violation of probation affidavit that had been filed was withdrawn, yet Pangburn’s probationary term was modified to provide for his placement in the treatment program. Jail pending placement was not a term of any agreement and nothing in the record furnished reveals a basis to support that detention. No statute or rule of procedure authorizes his continued detention.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus granted.

GROSS, C.J., MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We grant Brandon Pangburn’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. Pangburn is currently in jail awaiting placement in a residential treatment program. No authority has been identified to support his detention. Compare § 916.107(1), Fla. Stat. (2009). The violation of probation affidavit that had been filed was withdrawn, yet Pangburn’s probationary term was modified to provide for his placement in the treatment program. Jail pending placement was not a term of any agreement and nothing in the record furnished reveals a basis to support that detention. No statute or rule of procedure authorizes his continued detention.

Petition for writ of habeas corpus granted.

GROSS, C.J., MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 So. 3d 578, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11421, 2010 WL 3037262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pangburn-v-bradshaw-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack