Panduit Corp. v. Rea
This text of Panduit Corp. v. Rea (Panduit Corp. v. Rea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
PANDUIT CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
TERESA STANEK REA, Acting Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Appellee,
AND
ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, Cross Appellant. ______________________
2012-1437, -1438 ______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Reexamination No. 95/000,413. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JESSE O. COLLIER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of Alexan- dria, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were JAMES A. OLIFF, JOHN W. O’MEARA, and ERIC D. MOREHOUSE.
COKE MORGAN STEWART, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief was ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor.
PHILIP P. CASPERS, Carlson Caspers Vandenburgh Lindquist & Schuman, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for cross appellant. With him on the brief were TIMOTHY A. LINDQUIST, SAMUEL A. HAMER, and JOSEPH W. WINKELS. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 12, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Panduit Corp. v. Rea, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/panduit-corp-v-rea-cafc-2013.