Pandozy v. Beaty
269 F. App'x 449
Opinion
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation dated August 3, 2007.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pandozy v. Beaty, 269 F. App'x 449 (5th Cir. 2008).
269 F. App'x 449 (Pandozy v. Beaty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.